您的瀏覽器不支援 JavaScript喔,請開啟 Javascript 功能。
跳到主要內容
:::
Tamkang University
Tamkang University Chueh-Sheng Memorial Library
Sitemap
Login
繁體中文
X
About
About the DILS / Our Mission / Facility
Goals
Career Prospects
Future Prospects
Faculty
Full-Time Faculty
Adjunct Faculty
Professor Emeritus
Retired Faculty
Administration Staff
Admissions
International Students
Student Life
Programs
Undergraduate Program
University Department
Flexible Educational
Graduate Programs
Graduate Program
E-Learning Executive Program
Research
Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences
Dissertation
Careers
Forms
Curriculum Section
Registrar Section(Student Affairs)
Registrar Section(Grade Affairs)
General Affairs
Freshman
jouniorhigh
Home
Faculty
Full-Time Faculty
:::
Full-Time Faculty
Adjunct Faculty
Professor Emeritus
Retired Faculty
Administration Staff
Title
Differences Between Bibliographic Coupling and Co-Citation at the Article Level in Library and Information Science Publications
Year
109
Semester
1
Publish Date
2020/12/31
Journal Name
Differences Between Bibliographic Coupling and Co-Citation at the Article Level in Library and Information Science Publications
Journal Name Other
All Author
Hsiao, T.-M.; Chen, K.-H.
Unit
Publisher
Volume
Journal of Library and Information Science Research 15(1), p.97-132
Summary
We investigated differences between bibliographic coupling (BC) and co-citation (CC) in article pairs and their possible effects. Although several studies have investigated these methods, most have focused on the most effective method for specific applications according to clustering results. We investigated the differences between BC strength (BCS) and CC strength (CCS) of library and information science (LIS) by using articles published from 2009 to 2018 among 44 LIS journals in Journal Citation Reports. Article pairs were based on 1,446 articles from 30 journals published in 2009. BCS was measured according to common references, and CCS was measured according to CCs in the 22,577 articles published in the 44 LIS journals from 2009 to 2018. Different relationship patterns were observed between BC and CC. The authors are usually in common when an article pair has high BCS. It shows that authors’ citation preferences may affect BCS largely. Although CCS was not affected by citation preferences, CC identified considerably fewer relationships and demonstrated weaknesses in the years following publication. Additionally, sufficient time lag was necessary to reveal the CC relationships between article pairs. In LIS, the time lag to reveal the majority of CC relationships was more than 2 years.
Keyword
Informetrics;Bibliographic coupling;Co-citation
Use Lang
English
ISSN
1990-9128
Journalnature
國內
Included in
,TSSCI
UniversityCooperation
CorrespondingAuthor
Kuang-hua Chen
Reviewsystem
是
Country
中華民國
Open Call for Papers
PublicationStyle
電子版